School Ethics Commission Adopts Numerous Decisions at December Meeting, Conducts Other Business
January 25, 2024
The School Ethics Commission held its last regularly scheduled meeting of the year Dec. 19, 2023.
January 25, 2024
The School Ethics Commission held its last regularly scheduled meeting of the year Dec. 19, 2023.
January 10, 2024
At its Dec. 19, 2023, meeting, the School Ethics Commission adopted two new advisory opinions.
January 05, 2024
The School Ethics Commission dismissed certain matters due to a "lack of probable cause" at its Nov. 28 meeting.
December 27, 2023
On appeal to the Appellate Division, the court considered whether the commissioner of education erroneously expanded the meaning of N.J.S.A. 18A:12-24(c) by finding that the named respondents committed a violation, and whether the commissioner erroneously rejected the named respondents’ advice of counsel defense.
November 09, 2023
At its Oct. 17 meeting, the School Ethics Commission dismissed four matters that came before it.
November 03, 2023
Stay tuned for a subsequent article in next week’s School Board Notes, which will review the matters the SEC dismissed at its Oct. 17, 2023, meeting.
October 16, 2023
The School Ethics Commission has adopted a number of decisions finding violations of the act, and it has recommended penalties for those board members who failed to adhere to their prescribed ethical mandates.
October 06, 2023
The agenda for the School Ethics Commission’s meeting on Sept. 26, 2023, included the adoption of three decisions and several other items of note.
September 08, 2023
The agenda for the School Ethics Commission’s meeting Aug. 22, 2023, included the review of three ethics complaints pursuant to the SEC’s previous regulations; the adoption of seven decisions; and the removal of Advisory Opinion A01-01 from the SEC’s website.
August 15, 2023
At the School Ethics Commission’s regularly scheduled meeting July 25, 2023, six decisions were adopted. Of the six decisions, four resulted in the dismissal of the ethics charges that had been filed against the named respondents, all of whom were board members.